Focus
February 2026 - Financial Services Industry Update Amid renewed market volatility and tightening liquidity conditions in early 2026, industry analysts report a noticeable increase in demand for non-purpose stock loans and securities-based lending solutions. Following sharp fluctuations across major indices in Q1, high-net-worth investors and business owners are increasingly turning
Research
The securities lending market stands at a defining moment in 2026 - shaped by macroeconomic pressures, infrastructure evolution, regulatory shifts, and shifting patterns of liquidity and demand. While the core mechanics of supply and borrow remain familiar, recent developments across capital markets and financial infrastructure are creating meaningful implications for
Focus
Institutional research highlights private credit growth outpacing traditional syndicated loan markets, with volumes in the asset class having expanded significantly over the past five years. This ongoing shift reinforces the interconnectedness between private credit trends and securities financing activity, particularly for institutional borrowers seeking alternative liquidity sources. You can read
Focus
Regulatory timelines continue to move, but the direction has not changed. Reporting obligations are delayed, not diluted. For market participants, this reinforces a familiar pattern: preparation quietly continues long before enforcement formally begins. The operational burden rarely arrives overnight. It accumulates slowly, then becomes unavoidable.
Focus
The latest data on income from securities lending operations looks encouraging, but it still masks uneven risk distribution. A relatively small group of companies continues to account for a disproportionately large share of activity, while broad accessibility remains fragmented. This creates a market where the overall figures indicate strength, but
Focus
The most useful “news” in stock loan is often not an announcement - it’s a pattern: revenues up, volatility up, compliance timelines shifting, more reporting frameworks maturing. In that environment, the edge is usually not knowing the headline first. It’s understanding what changes operational behavior: * how lenders react
Focus
We’re seeing a continued push toward platforms and data products around securities finance — not because everyone loves modernization, but because the market is tired of fragmentation. EquiLend’s own public updates around revenue, balances, and product distribution are part of that momentum. The point isn’t that platforms will
Focus
Europe’s SFTR framework is explicit about reporting, access, aggregation, and publication - but anyone who has lived through reporting regimes knows that adding data is not the same as improving understanding. The first phase of any transparency regime tends to produce: * inconsistent mapping * interpretation disputes * operational pain * dashboards that
Focus
The SEC pushed out compliance dates for both securities lending reporting (Rule 10c-1a) and short position/short activity reporting (Rule 13f-2) with a two-year extension discussed publicly in December 2025. Some people read that as “the pressure is off.” It isn’t. Delays don’t change the destination. They just
Focus
January numbers look impressive: global securities lending revenue reportedly hit $1.24B (+32% YoY) with balances staying above $4T. The trap is assuming this automatically means “more supply” or “calmer borrow.” In reality, strong headline revenues are often a mix of volatility, fee dispersion, and concentrated specials. When markets swing,
Research
Selecting a stock loan lender is rarely treated as a strategic decision. In many cases, it is framed as a technical choice driven by availability, headline rates, or convenience. That framing is misleading. The lender you work with shapes not only pricing, but reliability, flexibility, and risk over the full
Focus
In many parts of the financial system, speed is the primary advantage. In stock lending, familiarity often matters more. Access to reliable borrow is frequently shaped by established relationships, historical behavior, and perceived reliability. Borrowers who are known quantities tend to experience smoother access, more consistent terms, and greater flexibility